The Core i9-7940X is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-6100, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $420.35 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-7940X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 28 vs 6 threads
Advantages of the FX-6100
- Up to 93% cheaper – $29.65 vs $450.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 95 vs 165 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i9-7940X cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i9-7940X vs FX-6100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-7940X vs FX-6100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-7940X vs FX-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-7940X vs FX-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-7940X
Sep 1st, 2017
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
43%
L3 Cache
8 MB
42%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-7940X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $1,399.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
14 | Cores | 6 |
28 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
19.25 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
