The Core i9-7940X is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $191.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-7940X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 28 vs 20 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-10900F
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 42% cheaper – $258.99 vs $450.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 65 vs 165 Watts
Core i9-7940X vs Core i9-10900F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, $
$258.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
100%
Core i9-7940X vs Core i9-10900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-7940X vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-7940X vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-7940X
Sep 1st, 2017
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
96%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
71%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-7940X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $1,399.00 | MSRP | $464.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
14 | Cores | 10 |
28 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
| 19.25 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
