In The First Descendant, the Core i9-7940X is slightly faster than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-7940X
- Up to 2% faster in The First Descendant – 112 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The First Descendant
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2017 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The First Descendant FPS Calculator
Core i9-7940X vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-7940X vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-7940X vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-7940X
Sep 1st, 2017
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
4 MB
21%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-7940X Sep 1st, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $1,399.00 | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 165W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
