Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-7920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1843 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Core i9-7920X
- Up to 36% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $321.00 vs $499.80
- Up to 18% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 9 7950X - $2.53 vs $3.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 140 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 28% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-7920X - 163 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-7920X - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
127
78%
Value, $/FPS
$2.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$321
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $321 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Buy for $499.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-7920X | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |