In Atomfall, the Core i9-7920X is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-7920X
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Sep 10, 2017
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 55 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-7920X vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Average FPS
213 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
87%
Price, $
$395
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.85/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-7920X vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-7920X vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
50%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
46%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
81%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-7920X Sep 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| $1,199.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
| 140W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
