In Atomfall, the Core i9-7920X is slightly faster than the Core i7-2820QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-7920X
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 213 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 8 months newer – Sep 10, 2017 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 6 years and 8 months newer
Core i7-2820QM
- Consumes up to 68% less energy – 45 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 68% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-7920X vs Core i7-2820QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$395
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.85/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-7920X vs Core i7-2820QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-7920X vs Core i7-2820QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-2820QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
48%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
77%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-7920X Sep 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-2820QM Jan 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2011 |
| $1,199.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 140W | Power Consumption | 45W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
