In Deathloop, the Core i9-7920X is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $253 more expensive!
Core i9-7920X
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 10, 2017
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 72% cheaper – $96.99 vs $349.95
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 73% better value in Deathloop – $0.42 vs $1.58/FPS
- Up to 73% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 58 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i9-7920X vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Average FPS
221 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
97%
Price, $
$349.95
27%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
27%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-7920X vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-7920X vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
12 MB
73%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-7920X Sep 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2017 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $1,199.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
