The Core i9-7900X is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-10700F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $101.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-7900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of the Core i7-10700F
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 31% cheaper – $224.00 vs $325.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
Core i9-7900X vs Core i7-10700F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
191
100%
Min 1% FPS
126
100%
Price, $
$224
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Core i9-7900X vs Core i7-10700F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-7900X vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-7900X vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-7900X
Jun 26th, 2017
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
14 MB
88%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-7900X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $999.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
| 14 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
