In Atomfall, the Core i9-14900T is quite a bit faster than the Xeon E5640. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-14900T
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 241 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5640
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900T vs Xeon E5640: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900T vs Xeon E5640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900T vs Xeon E5640 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900T
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
41%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5640
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
53%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900T Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5640 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
