In Atomfall, the Core i9-14900KS is quite a bit faster than the Xeon X5675. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-14900KS
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall – 250 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 28 days newer – Mar 14, 2024 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 13 years and 28 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5675
- Consumes up to 37% less energy – 95 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 37% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900KS vs Xeon X5675: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900KS
Mar 14th, 2024
Average FPS
250 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
187 FPS
100%
Price, $
$589.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.35/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900KS vs Xeon X5675 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900KS vs Xeon X5675 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900KS
Mar 14th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Xeon X5675
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
56%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900KS Mar 14th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5675 Feb 14th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 14th, 2024 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
| $689.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 150W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
