Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 46% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10900KF - 606 vs 414 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $249.00 vs $416.96
- Up to 13% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-14900KF - $0.60 vs $0.69 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
606
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
87%
Price, $
$416.96
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for $416.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1044 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
414
68%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$249
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1045 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900KF | vs | Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |