In Atomfall, the Core i9-14900KF is faster than the Core i5-9400F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $310 more expensive!
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 72% cheaper – $119.99 vs $429.99
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 67% better value in Atomfall – $0.57 vs $1.73/FPS
- Up to 67% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900KF vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
27%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
33%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
210 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
84%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900KF vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900KF vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
9 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
68%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 17th, 2023 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| $564.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
