Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Remnant II than Core i5-10400F - 107 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $74.38 vs $416.96
- Up to 78% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-14900KF - $0.85 vs $3.90 per FPS
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
107
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.9/FPS
22%
Price, $
$416.96
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $416.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
88
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $74.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900KF | vs | Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |