Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 651 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Core i9-12900F - 499 vs 470 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $359.99 vs $433.00
- Up to 11% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-14900K - $0.77 vs $0.87 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $433 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 271 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
470
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$359.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $359.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 270 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900K | vs | Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |