Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 83 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-14400F - 306 vs 291 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $164.99 vs $433.00
- Up to 60% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-14900K - $0.57 vs $1.42 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $433 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
291
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$164.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $164.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900K | vs | Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |