In Atomfall, the Core i9-14900HX is slightly faster than the Core i5-12400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-14900HX
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall – 243 vs 228 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 3 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 04, 2022
- Is 2 years and 3 days newer
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-12400F
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900HX vs Core i5-12400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
228 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
171 FPS
94%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900HX vs Core i5-12400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900HX vs Core i5-12400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900HX
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
18 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
76%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
86%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900HX Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12400F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $174.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1964 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
