In Atomfall, the Core i9-14900F is quite a bit faster than the Xeon X3450. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall
- Is 14 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 14 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Xeon X3450
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900F vs Xeon X3450: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900F vs Xeon X3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900F vs Xeon X3450 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Xeon X3450
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
55%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
24%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3450 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | $241.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1156 |
65W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
