In Atomfall, the Core i9-14900F is quite a bit faster than the Core i7-720QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall
- Is 14 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 23, 2009
- Is 14 years and 3 months newer
Core i7-720QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900F vs Core i7-720QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$476
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.94/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900F vs Core i7-720QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900F vs Core i7-720QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i7-720QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
48%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
24%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-720QM Sep 23rd, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Sep 23rd, 2009 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | $364.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | None |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
