In Control, the Core i9-14900F is slightly faster than the Core i3-10105F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $421 more expensive!
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 254 vs 249 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
Core i3-10105F
- Up to 75% cheaper – $138.99 vs $559.99
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 75% better value in Control – $0.55 vs $2.20/FPS
- Up to 75% better value in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900F vs Core i3-10105F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
24%
Value, $/FPS
$2.2/FPS
25%
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
249 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
98%
Price, $
$138.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900F vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900F vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
76%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
