In Atomfall, the Core i9-14900 is same performance as the Core Ultra 7 265F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $282 more expensive!
Core i9-14900
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Is 11 months and 30 days newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jan 08, 2024
- Is 11 months and 30 days newer
- Up to 49% cheaper – $288.00 vs $569.99
- Up to 49% cheaper
- Up to 50% better value in Atomfall – $1.17 vs $2.33/FPS
- Up to 50% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
99%
Price, $
$569.99
50%
Value, $/FPS
$2.33/FPS
50%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
88%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
83%
L3 Cache
30 MB
83%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
91%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900 Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
