In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-14900 is slightly slower than the Core i7-7700K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $376 more expensive!
Core i9-14900
- Is 7 years and 4 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 7 years and 4 days newer
- Consumes up to 29% less energy – 65 vs 91 Watts
- Consumes up to 29% less energy
Core i7-7700K
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 174 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 66% cheaper – $194.01 vs $569.99
- Up to 66% cheaper
- Up to 67% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $1.11 vs $3.35/FPS
- Up to 67% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900 vs Core i7-7700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
170 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
98%
Price, $
$569.99
34%
Value, $/FPS
$3.35/FPS
33%
Core i7-7700K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
174 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
130 FPS
100%
Price, $
$194.01
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900 vs Core i7-7700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900 vs Core i7-7700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
48%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i7-7700K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900 Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-7700K Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 91 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
