Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-13700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-13700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 369 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-13700F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-13700F - 163 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700F - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-13700F
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $267.00 vs $574.75
- Up to 52% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-14900 - $1.70 vs $3.53 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $574.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
Buy for $267 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900 | vs | Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |