In Atomfall, the Core i9-14900 is quite a bit faster than the Core i5-3470. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $501 more expensive!
Core i9-14900
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 244 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 65 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Core i5-3470
- Up to 88% cheaper – $68.76 vs $569.99
- Up to 88% cheaper
- Up to 85% better value in Atomfall – $0.36 vs $2.33/FPS
- Up to 85% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900 vs Core i5-3470: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$569.99
12%
Value, $/FPS
$2.33/FPS
15%
Core i5-3470
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
191 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
78%
Price, $
$68.76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900 vs Core i5-3470 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900 vs Core i5-3470 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-3470
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900 Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3470 Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | $184.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1155 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
