In Control, the Core i9-14900 is slightly faster than the Core i3-2100. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $521 more expensive!
Core i9-14900
- Up to 4% faster in Control – 254 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Control
- Is 12 years and 10 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Feb 20, 2011
- Is 12 years and 10 months newer
Core i3-2100
- Up to 91% cheaper – $49.00 vs $569.99
- Up to 91% cheaper
- Up to 91% better value in Control – $0.20 vs $2.24/FPS
- Up to 91% better value in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900 vs Core i3-2100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$569.99
8%
Value, $/FPS
$2.24/FPS
9%
Core i3-2100
Feb 20th, 2011
Average FPS
245 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
96%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900 vs Core i3-2100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900 vs Core i3-2100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-2100
Feb 20th, 2011
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
24%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900 Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-2100 Feb 20th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Feb 20th, 2011 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | $117.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
