In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Core i9-14900 is slightly slower than the Celeron G1820 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $470 more expensive!
Core i9-14900
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Dec 01, 2013
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
Celeron G1820
- Up to 1% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 261 vs 259 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Up to 82% cheaper – $99.88 vs $569.99
- Up to 82% cheaper
- Up to 83% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – $0.38 vs $2.20/FPS
- Up to 83% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900 vs Celeron G1820: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
259 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
192 FPS
98%
Price, $
$569.99
17%
Value, $/FPS
$2.2/FPS
17%
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Average FPS
261 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
196 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900 vs Celeron G1820 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900 vs Celeron G1820 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900 Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G1820 Dec 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1150 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
