In Deathloop, the Core i9-13900T is slightly faster than the Xeon W3530. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900T
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop – 237 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3530
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900T vs Xeon W3530: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900T vs Xeon W3530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900T vs Xeon W3530 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
39%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Xeon W3530
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
58%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3530 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
