In Rust, the Core i9-13900T is faster than the Core i7-9700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900T
- Up to 15% faster in Rust – 269 vs 233 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900T vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
233 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
59 FPS
70%
Price, $
$245.68
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
37%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
