In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-13900T is slightly slower than the Core i7-6700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900T
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Aug 05, 2015
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 35 vs 91 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
Core i7-6700K
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 175 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900T vs Core i7-6700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-6700K
Aug 5th, 2015
Average FPS
175 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i7-6700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i7-6700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
28%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i7-6700K
Aug 5th, 2015
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6700K Aug 5th, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Aug 5th, 2015 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | $339.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 91 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
