In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-13900T is slightly slower than the Core i7-2635QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900T
- Is 12 years and 1 day newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 12 years and 1 day newer
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-2635QM
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 199 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900T vs Core i7-2635QM: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i7-2635QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i7-2635QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i7-2635QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
55%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-2635QM Jan 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2011 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | Intel BGA 1224 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | unknown |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
