In Rust, the Core i9-13900T is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 1% faster in Rust – 273 vs 269 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Rust
- Is 1 year and 3 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 04, 2023
- Is 1 year and 3 days newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900T vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
273 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
87 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
52%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
98%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
83%
L3 Cache
33 MB
92%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
