In Deathloop, the Core i9-13900T is slightly faster than the Core i5-9400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900T
- Up to 8% faster in Deathloop – 237 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Deathloop
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900T vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
220 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
93%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
38%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
9 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
