In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-13900T is slightly slower than the Core i5-7600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900T
- Is 6 years newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 6 years newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-7600
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 176 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900T vs Core i5-7600: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
176 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
132 FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.34
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i5-7600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i5-7600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
31%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7600 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
