In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-13900T is slightly slower than the Core i5-11600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900T
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i5-11600K
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 170 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900T vs Core i5-11600K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
170 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i5-11600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i5-11600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
28%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600K Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | $262.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
