In Atomfall, the Core i9-13900T is faster than the Core i3-4370. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900T
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 240 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Core i3-4370
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900T vs Core i3-4370: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i3-4370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i3-4370 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
29%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-4370
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4370 Jul 21st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
