In Deathloop, the Core i9-13900T is slightly faster than the Core i3-330M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900T
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 237 vs 227 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer
Core i3-330M
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900T vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
227 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
96%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
52%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
19%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
