In Atomfall, the Core i9-13900T is quite a bit faster than the Core i3-3217U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900T
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall – 240 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900T vs Core i3-3217U: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i3-3217U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i3-3217U in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 17 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | unknown |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
