In Atomfall, the Core i9-13900T is slightly faster than the Core i3-10105F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900T
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 240 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-10105F
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900T vs Core i3-10105F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
211 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
88%
Price, $
$109
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900T vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
30%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
