Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 667 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900K.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-11900K - 225 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i9-11900K
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $335.00 vs $419.00
- Up to 14% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900KS - $1.60 vs $1.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $419 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
209
93%
Value, $/FPS
$1.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$335
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $335 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KS | vs | Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |