In Atomfall, the Core i9-13900KF is quite a bit faster than the Core i7-980X. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $359 more expensive!
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 6 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 12 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Core i7-980X
- Up to 65% cheaper – $189.95 vs $549.00
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 56% better value in Atomfall – $0.99 vs $2.23/FPS
- Up to 56% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900KF vs Core i7-980X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
34%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
44%
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Average FPS
190 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
77%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900KF vs Core i7-980X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900KF vs Core i7-980X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-980X Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 27th, 2022 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $564.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
125 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
