In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i9-13900KF is slightly slower than the Core i5-540M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900KF
- Is 12 years and 8 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 12 years and 8 months newer
Core i5-540M
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 247 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900KF vs Core i5-540M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
213 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
86%
Price, $
$549
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.57/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900KF vs Core i5-540M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900KF vs Core i5-540M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-540M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.073 GHz
53%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-540M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 27th, 2022 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $564.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
