The Core i9-13900K is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-660, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $372.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-13900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-660
- Up to 93% cheaper – $27.99 vs $400.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 73 vs 125 Watts
Core i9-13900K vs Core i5-660 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-660
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
168
76%
Min 1% FPS
113
78%
Price, $
$27.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900K vs Core i5-660 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900K vs Core i5-660 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900K vs Core i5-660 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-660
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.33 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
24%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-13900K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-660 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $589.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1333 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
