Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 385 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14600KF.
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-14600KF - 136 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14600KF - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-14600KF
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $219.98 vs $401.00
- Up to 43% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900K - $1.67 vs $2.95 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $401 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 246 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
132
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $219.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900K | vs | Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 14 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |