The Core i9-13900K is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i3-3210 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $333.52 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-13900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-3210
- Up to 68% cheaper – $159.00 vs $492.52
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
Core i9-13900K vs Core i3-3210 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
221
100%
Min 1% FPS
145
100%
Price, $
$492.52
32%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
42%
Core i9-13900K vs Core i3-3210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900K vs Core i3-3210 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900K vs Core i3-3210 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-13900K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-3210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| $589.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 5.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
