Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 245 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-12100F - 136 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $76.80 vs $499.99
- Up to 83% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900K - $0.63 vs $3.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 58 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.68/FPS
17%
Price, $
$499.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
122
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $76.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900K | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |