In Atomfall, the Core i9-13900F is slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 3800X. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $190 more expensive!
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 243 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Ryzen 7 3800X
- Up to 36% cheaper – $339.99 vs $529.95
- Up to 36% cheaper
- Up to 29% better value in Atomfall – $1.55 vs $2.18/FPS
- Up to 29% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900F vs Ryzen 7 3800X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
64%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
71%
Ryzen 7 3800X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
219 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
90%
Price, $
$339.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900F vs Ryzen 7 3800X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900F vs Ryzen 7 3800X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Ryzen 7 3800X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
32 MB
89%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 3800X Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | AM4 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
