The Core i9-13900F is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the EPYC 7502 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $495.01 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i9-13900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 55% cheaper – $399.99 vs $895.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of the EPYC 7502
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 64 vs 32 threads
Core i9-13900F vs EPYC 7502
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
237
100%
Min 1% FPS
162
100%
Price, $
$399.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900F vs EPYC 7502 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900F vs EPYC 7502 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900F vs EPYC 7502 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
75%
L3 Cache
36 MB
28%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
EPYC 7502
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
60%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-13900F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EPYC 7502 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
$524.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Raptor Lake-S | Codename | Rome |
65 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 32 |
32 | Threads | 64 |
2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 128 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | No |