In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i9-13900F is same performance as the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900F
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Is 2 years and 9 days newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Jan 04, 2023
- Is 2 years and 9 days newer
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900F vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.48/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
99%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900F vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900F vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
88%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
96%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
