In Rust, the Core i9-13900F is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $242 more expensive!
Core i9-13900F
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 1% faster in Rust – 278 vs 274 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Rust
- Is 2 years and 3 days newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jan 04, 2023
- Is 2 years and 3 days newer
- Up to 46% cheaper – $288.00 vs $529.91
- Up to 46% cheaper
- Up to 47% better value in Rust – $1.03 vs $1.93/FPS
- Up to 47% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900F vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
274 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
87 FPS
97%
Price, $
$529.91
54%
Value, $/FPS
$1.93/FPS
53%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
278 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900F vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900F vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
88%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
83%
L3 Cache
30 MB
83%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
95%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
