In Control, the Core i9-13900F is slightly faster than the Core i7-9700F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $283 more expensive!
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 254 vs 249 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 53% cheaper – $247.23 vs $529.90
- Up to 53% cheaper
- Up to 52% better value in Control – $0.99 vs $2.08/FPS
- Up to 52% better value in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900F vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.9
46%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
48%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
249 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
98%
Price, $
$247.23
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900F vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900F vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
84%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
