In Rust, the Core i9-13900F is faster than the Core i5-9400F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $410 more expensive!
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 21% faster in Rust – 274 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 77% cheaper – $119.99 vs $529.90
- Up to 77% cheaper
- Up to 73% better value in Rust – $0.53 vs $1.93/FPS
- Up to 73% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900F vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
274 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
87 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.9
22%
Value, $/FPS
$1.93/FPS
27%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
226 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
63%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900F vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900F vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
9 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
